This awoke me. Time’s Mission is to Reveal God in Form. I repeated it over and over too lazy to grab a notebook from my suitcase.  I saved it wondering if there was an articulation of behind those amazing words.  

Here we go… God says:

Your curious nature will never be satisfied.  You cannot take this word string and articulate it. There’s no way to explain what God is in the realm of time, and what time is in the realm of God.  Each is a universe unto itself. Each is a time-restrained nature.  God is restrained by that which makes time purposeless, and each that is not God cannot be declared by time.

Time has no definition in God’s realm.  Time cannot be self-aware.  Time cannot urge itself forward, it just is a forward manner of progressive understanding.  Time is the expression of its own conductivity.

SONDRA: What is, “Time is the expression of its own conductivity”? Does that mean that time reveals that which comes to form? So it cannot become anything that it was not already?

GOD: Well yes and no.  Time is not its own sake, it is the measurement of what exists.  So if it cannot be measured by time, it does not exist in time.

SONDRA: So if what exists outside of time cannot exist in time, then is it only a matter of time for that which is not in time to formulate through time?

GOD: No. Time will never fully reveal God, because God is not form, but each form is an aspect of God. There’s no way for God to fully express what God is in time’s measurement, no matter how long time exists.

SONDRA: Why?

GOD: Because time is a construct of God.

SONDRA: So if we make something, man makes something, then it’s in the making of it that resists our full expression?

GOD: Yes.  A computer or robot can never become fully human because man cannot perceive man’s own nature fully, so each and every attempt will be incomplete.

SONDRA: But each attempt is some aspect?

GOD: Yes.  This is what man is to God. Man is God’s attempt to understand what God is by using an intelligent mind that can talk back.

2 Comments

  1. i imagine that stephen hawking would be interested in this

    • Well Julia, that would be a feat, because it is my understanding that he is an atheist, at least in its simplest definition. He may indeed believe in something he’s never publicly articulated in the nature of cosmic consciousness, however.